The WM Right Way Meta ??? (Point of interest)
Match 47400808
- IIGaryII
- Uploaded By
- May 31, 2025
- Uploaded At
- 28:00
- Length
- 2.0.5
- Patch
Comments sign in to comment!
Hello Guys, and thanks you to VHSmonster for this game !! Well, level of this game is not the subject. Both players have random level. Somethings are good, other things are bad on mechanics. But, i want to open a point of insterest on my WM Build Order and my management of the entire game... Strategic WM look !! Everybody knows WM have some failures on the entire strategic game. Light T2 or T3 + T4 need to "win" the engagment before the T4, in fact, because the too high cost of actions T4 leaves allied opponent to build somethings too strong. Full T2 have some impasses (because of Jager PzSchreck smoke disappears, Flak 30 is a rheumatic grandfather)... Full T3 mongolisis on flank actions... But ... A light T3 + a light T2 ... feels good to open a pretty late game !! Stummel and PaK40 offers all you need at the beginning of middle game vs all Allied options. And the end of middle game with Jagers prepares perfectly the following allied issues for the late game !! The example is just on this replay. I win this game ... because my opponent stays inside strategics impasses !! And if you think about all issues, for Brit Side, and also for US Side ... Well, your WM army can always stay alive in good conditions. Of course, you need to play well, on skills, basics and evolved tactics fights, and you need to keep your units and use their abilities. But you always keep your destiny in your hands, with this BO version !! No impasses for WM ??? What do you think about, Guys ???